Kritické zhodnocení funkčnosti procesu strategického plánování ve vybraných menších městských částech hlavního města Prahy

Bachelory work is dealing with critical valorization of function of the process of strategic planning in small city districts in Prague (excluding districts 1-22). The practical part is made mostly from comparation of informations that were acquired from operated interviews in 4, small Prague city districts. From the interviews is clear that every adressed city district considers, for small districts, a certain form of strategic as a needed one, but there are some clear complications and negatives such as financial severity, afoul made priorities, filing of unrealizable projects, not enough sources etc. The results of the research show that a degree of functionality of the process of strategic planning isn’t in every chosen city districts the same and that it’s important for keeping some rules while making and fulfilling the plans. City Districts of Kunratice and Dolní Počernice have a strategic plan that they, by their own words are succesfully fulfilling. Although both of the City Districts made a several mistakes while making the plan that could crucially change it’s usefulness–while excogitationing the project meanings, the binding with territory plan were not thought of. A minimum of participation of the citizens while making the plan, there wasn’t established person that would draw the consequenses while not establishing projects etc. City District of Libuš doesn’t have a strategic plan, however, it had one in the past. Apart from the other districts it couldn’t fulfill the activities of the strategic plans because of financial reasons even though it was it was relatively well made. City District of Čakovice has a process of strategic planning solutioned in a different method (that it never had) – from the interview it seemed that they are satisfied with this form of plane ven though it’s not that efective as a complete strategic plan. For minimalizations of the negatives of the strategic plan process are practical parts submited and commented following suggestions: a strategic plan should be made a legally enforceable document, there should be a group of experts working on the projects together wirh the citizens, while making the projects intetions, current statistics and area plan should be available, a chozen person should tutor the making of the strategic plan, for the selected period (max. 2 years), only a certain number of projects should be determined, which will be included in the so-called action plan and will correspond to the current possibilities, a plan shoulld be made for only one election period, a certain participation of the citizens and so on.