The aim of the bachelor's thesis is to assess whether there are errors by experts in the form of argumentative fallacies, reliance on poor sources, and conflicts of interest in a medical conference on the topic of covid-19. In the theoretical part of the thesis, we start with a description of Evidence-based management (EBM) and Argumentation theory, including processes and competing theories. We then proceed with the characteristics of the data used, which include a video recording of the c... zobrazit celý abstraktThe aim of the bachelor's thesis is to assess whether there are errors by experts in the form of argumentative fallacies, reliance on poor sources, and conflicts of interest in a medical conference on the topic of covid-19. In the theoretical part of the thesis, we start with a description of Evidence-based management (EBM) and Argumentation theory, including processes and competing theories. We then proceed with the characteristics of the data used, which include a video recording of the conference, introductions of speakers, and medically oriented scientific articles. Subsequently, we continue with the Methodology; for the purpose of data analysis, the work is classified as a content analysis. In the practical part, we conduct content analysis of the video recording of the conference, where we identify and categorize errors by experts and describe any conflicts of interest. |